Debate over stem cell research paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Debate over stem cell - Research Paper ExampleThe issues of the stem cell look for have been a head for issue since many years. The issue has created a division between the scientific, political and religious groups throughout the world. The issue revolves around one question When exactly does the life begin? In order to get reliable stem cells and harvest the embryos cells, the scientists have to destroy it. The embryo might only sustain a few cells as less as four or five, but yet has ignited a debate where religious groups say destroying of these cells is represent to killing a human. Eventually, the debate entered the political area as well (Moore 7). Suddenly, these stem cells tended to be everywhere and still are. The complexity of these tiny stem cells has increase by every tick of the clock. The stem cell question has been funded by the state since years. The debate regarding the stem cells has threatened the religious beliefs, traditional alliances and challenged the c omprehension of life. The political war over embryonic stem cell question There is a political war over the embryonic stem cell research and the battle is over abortion with some twists. These cells are from embryos and many of the religious groups consider the embryo as life. But it is undeniable that these stem cells are vivid and can help many ailing patients thus the debate initiated that whether the stem cell research should be funded and allowed legally or not (Moore 7). The state has yen been involved in the political debate of using the federal monies to fund the stem cell research. Until 1996, the federal monies were used to fund the stem cell research as the primary source for championship but later in the same year, the Congress had passed the Dickey-Wicker amendment which banned the funding of any research which involved the foot or destruction of the human embryo through federal monies. The Congress argued that the stem cell research was unethical, religiously cont roversial and illegal. President George W. Bush back up this argument as well even though many of the members of the administration had opposing views that an embryo is not a human life and it should be allowed for throw out research to take advantage of the potential benefits it brings (Pressberg 65). The political controversy reshaped when President Barack Obama came into power and argued that the stem cell research should be expanded due to its benefits to the approaching of the community. The President initiated a new policy that was disliked by many of the religious scholars but cooled many at the same time. As the President allowed funding the stem cell research in three conditions firstly that the stem cell line was from the 22 that existed at Bushs time or had been created from the embryos which was discarded secondly that the donors were not paid for it and thirdly that the donors were clearly aware of what their embryos was being used for before they gave consent. Many religious scholars, who argued against the stem cell research and the fact that killing a human life (embryo) to save many others it unethical and unjustified, favoured this policy as it did not give consent to create or destroy human embryos but rather use those which were already discarded. However, this policy moved the scientists and they protested against it by filing a lawsuit in 2009. The scientists argued in the elusion that the new policy would increase the competition for funding affecting their chances of obtaining funds. Thus,